Adaptive leadership and the practice of medicine: a complexity-based approach to reframing the doctor-patient relationship.

نویسندگان

  • Marcus Thygeson
  • Lawrence Morrissey
  • Val Ulstad
چکیده

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES This paper applies the concepts of 'adaptive leadership', as developed by Ron Heifetz, MD, to the practice of medicine. METHODS Literature review and theory development. RESULTS Patients are complex adaptive systems facing both adaptive and technical health challenges. Technical health challenges are amenable to the simple or complicated expert-mediated technical interventions that are common in modern medicine, but complex adaptive challenges can only be addressed by patients doing the adaptive work to learn new attitudes, beliefs and behaviours. In medicine, we often make the mistake of offering technical interventions in lieu of supporting patients' adaptive work. This error can result in poor clinical outcomes and wasted resources. Expecting simple or complicated technical 'solutions' to resolve complex adaptive health challenges is a failure of adaptive leadership and violates Ashby's law of requisite variety. Adaptive leadership behaviours correspond to and complement doctor practices that have been shown to improve health outcomes and doctor-patient communication. CONCLUSIONS Adopting an adaptive leadership framework in the practice of medicine will require adaptive work on our part, but it promises to improve the doctor-patient relationship, increase our effectiveness as healers and reduce unnecessary health care utilization.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Exploring the Dimensions of Doctor-Patient Relationship in Clinical Practice in Hospital Settings

The Doctor-Patient Relationship (DPR) is a complex concept in the medical sociology in which patients voluntarily approach a doctor and thus become a part of a contract in which they tends to abide with the doctor’s guidance. Globally, the DPR has changed drastically over the years owing to the commercialization and privatization of the health sector. Furthermore, the dynamics of the DPR has sh...

متن کامل

Bridging the ‘Two Cultures’ of Research and Service: Can Complexity Theory Help?; Comment on “Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering With University-Based Researchers in Canada – A Call to ‘Re-imagine’ Research”

This commentary addresses Bowen et al’s empirical study of perspectives of Canadian healthcare staff towards research and their call for multi-faceted action to improve misalignments in the system. This commentary argues that tensions and misalignments between research and service are inherent and can never be eradicated. Building on previous work by Lanham et al, I pro...

متن کامل

Complex Leadership in Healthcare: A Scoping Review

Background Nowadays, health systems are generally acknowledged to be complex social systems. Consequently, scholars, academics, practitioners, and policy-makers are exploring how to adopt a complexity perspective in health policy and system research. While leadership and complexity has been studied extensively outside health, the implications of complexity theories for the study of leader...

متن کامل

Patient Relationship Management Method, an Approach toward Patient Satisfaction: A Case Study in a Public Hospital

Introduction: The aim of this project is to investigate the concepts of patient relationship management (PRM), patient satisfaction and their relationship. As healthcare industry has its own complexity, the so well defined idea in marketing which is CRM could not be implemented directly in health industry. Consequently the concept of PRM has been introduced. Metho...

متن کامل

Using Complexity to Simplify Knowledge Translation; Comment on “Using Complexity and Network Concepts to Inform Healthcare Knowledge Translation”

Putting health theories, research and knowledge into practice is a challenge referred to as the knowledge-toaction gap. Knowledge translation (KT), and its related concepts of knowledge mobilization, implementation science and research impact, emerged to mitigate this gap. While the social interaction view of KT has gained currency, scholars have not easily made a link between KT and the concep...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of evaluation in clinical practice

دوره 16 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010